Firefish: An Editor Evaluates the Whole Book Based on One Page

by Marcus on August 22, 2007

51o3rvpqal_aa240_.jpgHere it is Wednesday, and I’m just now getting to the Christian Science Fiction and Fantasy blog tour! My apologies to everyone for the weak showing this round. All that to say George Bryan Polivka’s The Legend of the Firefish looks awesome. He’s got a new blog, too.

I thought it would be fun to play acquisitions editor based on the first page. What if I got this first page as an unsolicited manuscript? What works? What questions does it raise?

For the sake of this educational thought experiment, I’m reprinting the first page here. (Since you can read it online at ChristianBook.com, I figured it was okay to reprint.)

The Chase

“You deaf, boy?”

Packer Throme didn’t answer. The last thing he wanted now was a fight. Dog Blestoe was a big man, bigger than Packer by three inches and thirty pounds, and Packer’s elder by thirty years. Leathery, gray-headed, lean and muscular from a lifetime of hard labor, Dog stood across the table with his hands knotted into fists.

Packer stayed seated and silent.

Dog snorted. He had made sure Packer had left town humiliated four years ago. He would make sure the boy returned the same way. He rammed the table with his thigh, sloshing the mug of ale sitting on it. Packer caught it before it tipped.

“Say something!”

Packer didn’t look up.

Dog grabbed the back of a wooden chair and tossed it aside, clattering it across the plank flooring, where it nearly shinned one of the regulars. “Disrespect!” he seethed, nodding around the pub at the undeniable proof Packer had just offered them all.

They did not nod back. These fishermen had come with their usual intentions, to talk and drink and smoke their pipes and do some modest complaining after a hard day at sea. Not to witness this. Not again.

“Stand up, boy!”

If I’m an acquisitions editor, I would be looking for three things: story, style, and voice.

Story on Page One

Conflict? From the very beginning there is a strong sense of conflict. It doesn’t really matter whether this page’s conflict is the primary conflict or not. I would just need to see that the author can pull it off. Packer and Dog are on the verge of a fight, and Packer will probably lose. I know this because Packer is significantly smaller than Dog. And because Packer has lost before. Shamefully. Shame is a good concept for page one here. It gets my attention.

Character? You bet. The dude’s name is Dog. He even barks. And Packer is a calm hero. He doesn’t let the beer tip. You gotta love him for that.

Setting? Absolutely. The scene starts with a tight closeup on Dog’s mouth. It expands to include Packer. Finally, we see the full stage. The pub’s plank flooring and the hostile fishermen who just want to relax. In fact, their hostility toward Dog provide a subtle implication of the conflict’s outcome. Whether the outcome happens as I’m expecting or not doesn’t matter. The point is that I want to keep reading to find out.

Style and Voice on Page One

Paragraphing? It’s compelling. The paragraphs alternate lengths. And those short paragraphs pack a good punch. Almost literally.

Sentences? This author knows how to use sentences to work over the reader. He keeps the pace moving with lots of short simple sentences. Most of the complexity gets tacked onto the end of an agglutinating, cumulative sentence. The author also makes good use of parallelism. Look at the paragraph that begins, “Dog snorted.” Four of the five sentences have Dog or “he” as the subject, but the paragraph doesn’t feel clunky and repetitive. That’s style.

Finally, the author isn’t afraid of slow sentences. He uses them to great effect to slow down certain moments, almost like a quick bit of slow motion in a movie. Consider this sentence:

Dog grabbed the back of a wooden chair and tossed it aside, clattering it across the plank flooring, where it nearly shinned one of the regulars.

That sentence is quite a bit more complicated than others, so the reader has to slow to read it. And we slow down for a purpose–to see that chair clattering away as the camera widens for the first time to show us the whole room in the pub where the fishermen are waiting, disgruntled that their afternoon is getting disrupted by Dog.

Final Thought

If I were an acquisitions editor (or a browser in the bookstore), I would definitely read more. The only question this page raises is the unavoidable one. Can the author sustain this level of quality? And if he does, can he deliver on his promises at the end of the novel with a satisfying resolution?

Note to Readers: You may be thinking, “How dare anyone pass judgment on a book based on the first page!”

It helps that I like the first page. But I think this would be valid even if I decided the book would probably stink.

Here’s how I got this idea. I was listening to the Writers on Writing podcast this week while I mowed the lawn. Because I’m a dork that way. (And please don’t be offended, Barbara. I don’t mean only dorks listen to Writers on Writing. Just that only dorks do it while they mow.)

So in the August 14 episode, Literary Agent Adam Chromy says he only reads the first page of an unsolicited manuscript before deciding whether he’s interested.

Then today over on Publisher’s Weekly, the Book Maven posted “One Out of Four Ain’t Bad?” Several commenters mention the number of pages they give a book. Thirty pages. Fifty pages. One hundred pages.

I give a book twenty. If I don’t like it by then, I’m done. Maybe forever. Maybe not. That depends on the cover and the author and the topic, to be honest.

All of this made me think. Let’s assume every book sends its first page as the sample to the publisher. What on that page would hook an acquisitions editor… or not? Whether the author sent the actual first page doesn’t matter. Because the first page of a book either hooks a reader… or not.

Blog Tour Participants:

Finally, this is the CSFF blog tour. Here are the other folks participating this month:
Trish Anderson
Brandon Barr
Wayne Thomas Batson
Jim Black
Justin Boyer
Grace Bridges
Amy Browning
Jackie Castle
Valerie Comer
Karri Compton
Frank Creed
Lisa Cromwell
CSFF Blog Tour
Gene Curtis
D. G. D. Davidson
Merrie Destefano
Janey DeMeo
Jeff Draper
April Erwin
Linda Gilmore
Beth Goddard
Marcus Goodyear
Russell Griffith
Jill Hart
Katie Hart
Sherrie Hibbs
Christopher Hopper
Jason Joyner
Kait
Karen
Dawn King
Tina Kulesa
Lost Genre Guild
Terri Main
Rachel Marks
Karen McSpadden
Rebecca LuElla Miller
Eve Nielsen
John W. Otte
John Ottinger
Robin Parrish
Lyn Perry
Deena Peterson
Rachelle
Cheryl Russel
Chawna Schroeder
Mirtika Schultz
James Somers
Steve Trower
Speculative Faith
Jason Waguespac
Daniel I. Weaver

{ 15 comments… read them below or add one }

1 L.L. Barkat August 22, 2007 at 5:56 pm

I give a book the first page. Except when I need to read it for a book club. Or if it comes recommended. Recommended books get two to five pages. So this brings up a good question for the blogosphere, where everything is compressed. How many words do you give a blogger, or sentences, or paragraphs?

Reply

2 Mary E. DeMuth August 22, 2007 at 6:07 pm

I give a book about 50 pages. If it’s not grabbing me, I leave it behind. But if I were an editor (sung to the tune of “If I were a rich man”), I’d give it one shot. One page. Can you grab me by the throat or am I yawning?

Reply

3 Rebecca LuElla Miller August 23, 2007 at 1:10 am

Really interesting, Marcus. Quite eye-opening to think in terms of story, style, and voice.

Becky

Reply

4 Tanya Dennis August 23, 2007 at 6:50 am

Anyone read “The First Five Pages” by Noah Lukeman? It’s based on this exact premise — that nearly all manuscripts can be accepted or dismissed in five pages or less. The book teaches good self-editing skills.

Reply

5 Marcus August 23, 2007 at 8:19 am

L.L., interesting question about the blogosphere. I suppose I give a blogger about 60 seconds to convince me there’s something worth reading. If there’s a layout problem, I may decide even sooner than that. Unless the blogger has commented on my blog. Then I usually try to comment in return.

Mary, good to see you! Fifty pages is very generous of you. After getting an MA in literature, I’ve just spent too much time reading crappy books to do that. I’ve never heard of anyone comparing an editor to a rich man. Ya ha deedle deedle, bubba bubba deedle deedle dum.

Becky, story, style, and voice are the big three in my opinion. Style and voice overlap some. For me, style is more about using the tools effectively. Voice is more about expressing a sense of the author’s identity (either actual or assumed). Good style is a matter of craft. Good voice is a matter of integrity.

Tanya, I definitely need to read Lukeman’s book. Or at least the first page.

Reply

6 real live preacher August 23, 2007 at 2:09 pm

Fascinating to watch your editor’s mind work behind the scenes. Editors can often articulate what writers do by instinct.

Reply

7 Marcus August 24, 2007 at 9:36 am

Gordon, that’s a great point to remember. No one thinks about these things while they are actually writing. Just like I don’t think about how far to push my foot on the gas when I’m driving a car, or where to place my hand on the steering wheel as I begin to make a left hand turn.

That said, the difference between a professional writer and an amateur (besides the payment issue, of course), is a willingness to look back through their work with this kind of eye. Some writers will need to hire a professional editor to help. But I think prolific writers develop an intuition about what works and what doesn’t, through sheer persistence.

Reply

8 spaghettipie August 24, 2007 at 10:00 am

I almost didn’t read your post, but I gave it two paragraphs and you hooked me in the second one. Interesting slant on your CSFF tour.

Reply

9 Craver-VII August 24, 2007 at 2:52 pm

Ahem.

Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday to you.
Happy birthday dear Marcuuuuus.
Haaaappy birthday tooooo youuuuu!!!!

*applause*

Reply

10 Amy August 24, 2007 at 3:18 pm

Thanks Craver – I was hoping someone would acknowledge it – he thinks birthdays are no big deal. But without this day there would be no Good Word Editing! WHAT A GREAT DAY!!!

Reply

11 Marcus August 24, 2007 at 3:32 pm

You made me smile, Craver! Thanks, man. How’d you know?

Reply

12 Craver-VII August 24, 2007 at 4:03 pm

We’re twins separated at birth, remember? So how could I forget? ;-)

Reply

13 gbpolivka August 25, 2007 at 6:32 pm

Interesting story regarding these pages… I didn’t send Harvest House the first chapter. Nick Harrison, senior editor there, got interested from an excerpt deep in the story, and then asked me to send him three or four chapters. I didn’t send him Chapter One because I thought it was one of the weaker ones (and, knowing how important it was, I had rewritten it so many times I had lost touch with whether it was any good or not). He actually liked it, but we still worked more on that chapter than any other in the book. I remember well the moment I felt if finally felt as good to me as the rest.

Thanks for an interesting take, and a worthwhile read!
–Bryan

Reply

14 Eve August 27, 2007 at 9:03 am

Happy b-day, Mark!!

As to your post, I usually judge a book by its cover. :)

Reply

15 Susan August 29, 2007 at 10:20 am

Belated happy birthday from sunny Chicago!

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post: Editing with the Heart of a Teacher

Next post: Disappearing for a Bit